St. Louis River/Interlake/Duluth Tar

“Tar seep” in an upland area at the head of Slip 6. The tar-like substances shown here are similar to the contaminants that were removed during the remediation process at several sites within the St. Louis River Estuary.
“Tar seep” in an upland area at the head of Slip 6. The tar-like substances shown here are similar to the contaminants that were removed during the remediation process at several sites within the St. Louis River Estuary.

Contacts

NOAA--Office of Response and Restoration
Ann Arbor, MI
(734) 741-2272

St. Louis River/Interlake/Duluth Tar

Hazardous waste Site | Duluth, Minnesota | 1890s – Present

What Happened?

As result of historical industrial operations along the St. Louis River numerous hazardous chemicals were released into the environment. The St. Louis River Superfund site was listed on the National Priorities List in 1983.

The St. Louis River/Interlake/Duluth Tar site has been used for industrial purposes since 1890. Activities at the site have included coking plants, tar and chemical companies, the production of pig iron, meat-packing, and as a rail to truck transfer point for bulk commodities. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; a group of organic contaminants that are often the byproducts of petroleum processing or combustion. Many are toxic to aquatic life and several are suspected of causing cancer in humans. are the primary contaminant of concern. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency worked with the responsible parties to conduct a clean-up effort.

 

What Were the Impacts?

NOAA and other trusteesGovernment officials acting on behalf of the public when there is injury to, destruction of, loss of, or threat to natural resources. have determined that impacts to natural resources and services extend throughout approximately 100 acres of the site. Recreational activities such as swimming and boats are discouraged at the site. Visible sheens and oil blooms have also likely decreased recreational fishing efforts nearby.

 

What’s Happening Now?

On June 30, 2017 Trustees announced a proposed $8.2 million settlement to restore injuries to natural resources.

The proposed settlement includes a draft Restoration Plan, which identifies the following proposed restoration projects:

  • Kingsbury Bay, $5,500,000, to enhance and restore a 70-acre shallow, sheltered embayment habitat that will add recreational access areas for fishing and a boat launch, improve habitat and reduce invasive vegetation. 

  • Kingsbury Creek watershed, $637,500, to reduce sediment deposition, improve water quality and sustain the shallow sheltered embayment habitat of the restored Kingsbury Bay.

  • Wild rice restoration, $332,000, to enhance wild rice stands within the estuary. Efforts typically include removing invasive vegetation and establishing a seed bank to provide a long-term seed source.

  • Cultural education opportunities, $30,000, to develop informational displays adjacent to wild rice restoration locations to communicate the importance of wild rice to the health of the St. Louis River estuary and the cultural traditions of local Native Americans.

The remaining settlement balance will reimburse the natural resource trustees for the costs to quantify natural resource damages and identify appropriate restoration projects.

The public is invited to comment on the proposed settlement and the draft Restoration Plan (Appendix A: Fish Study Data).

Comments on the proposed settlement are being accepted through August 7, 2017 and can be sent to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov. Comments on the draft Restoration Plan are to be made by email to Ronald.Wieland@state.mn.us with “SLRIDT RP/EA” in the subject line. To learn how to submit comments by mail please view the Federal Register Notice.

 

 

Last updated July 7, 2017